Sicha 19 Kislev – What is Chassidus (25)
Likutei Sichos – Vol 02 p 471 ff Class 25. The Yid. Part one. The Zohar vs. the Midrash, Who needs who? The religion needs the Yid (the practitioner) or yid needs Yiddishkeit?
Sefer Hasichos – Hadran 5746 (11)
Class Eleven. Three levels: 1) faith, 2) reason, 3) higher than reason. Page 253-4.
Sefer Hasichos – Hadran 5746 (10)
Class Ten. Three levels and in this order: 1)Reason, 2)Ein Sof that can be understood, 3) higher than reason. In footnote 22 he links this to ‘Matzui Rishon’ and ‘Aino matzui’ and holds that if we approach knowing Hashem from lower to higher levels then even higher levels can be understood at least a little…
Sefer Hasichos – Hadran 5746 (09)
Class Nine. Footnote 16 addresses the possibility that (since Hashem is ‘Nimna HaNimnaos,) He could in theory create a world that would not need to be recreated every second. But he did not do that. Therefore each philosophical idea must be supported by a Possuk otherwise we don’t know if it is really true or…
Sefer Hasichos – Hadran 5746 (08)
Class Eight. Footnote 17, Ain Sof mystical but it makes sense once one accepts the mysticism. Page 252. Footnote 17.
Sefer HaSichos – Beshalach 5751 (02)
Beshalach Exile and Redemption (117)(02) Class Two. Inside, traveling with Hashem in the מדבר going quick but not too quick. It takes longer than planned.
The Hadran HaGadol al HaRaMbaM (5735) (05)
Class Five. Beginning of the Sicha, how is the four word introduction ‘Yesod HaYesodos ViAmud HaChachmos’ an Halacha. The answer cannot be to tell us that 1) This is to be taught first, and 2) Teachers must address the questions of their students on this area of Torah first; because no one does it and…
The Hadran HaGadol al HaRaMbaM (5735)(03) – RaMbaM Hilchos Yesodei HaTorah (03)
Class Three. Halacha 6 introduces us to the first two Mitzvos 1) Yedias Hashem (and that) this includes all three ideas listed above: A. Understanding God (as a ‘mutzui rishon’) B. The Psukim, C. His presence (evidence) you can see in the world. 2) Not believing in any other force.
Sefer Hasichos – Hadran 5746 (06)
Class Six. More on footnote 14. The RaMbaM is speaking before the Tzimtzum and therefore cannot give the typical logical answer. The normal answer is understood by the issue of the ‘Nekuda HahaFlaa’ in RaMbaM: that there are two kinds of ‘k’dima’ (precedence) in time and in necessity. Accordingly understanding Yedia and B’chira is simple,…
Sefer Hasichos – Hadran 5746 (05)
Class Five. Note 14, the question of how Hashem’s knowledge of the future does not undermine free will and the complicated answer the RaMbaM gives. This is consistent with the (two) level(s) of higher than reason (and reason). Page 251-2. Footnote 14.
Your Support Matters
Help us continue to bring you new and exciting content and classes by supporting Inside chassidus with a tax-deductible donation
Donate TodayYour Support Matters
Help us continue to bring you new and exciting content and classes by supporting Inside chassidus with a tax-deductible donation
Donate Today