Page 34-6. This supplemental class is quite deep. It includes two ideas. 1) That to go from Yesh to a new Yesh requires Ayin in between, but that is not necessary when going from Koach hamskil to sechel galuy, as the Koach hamaskil is itself Ayin. 2) the Ayin is not a break but a transition…

Page 34-6. 3) The tzimtzum between koach haMaskil and Sechel Galuy. Three levels 1) Etzem, 2) Inyan, 3) Metzius. In Sechel these are 1) Koach Hiyuli HaAtzmi, 2) Koach Hili, 3) Koach HaGaluy.

Page 32-4. Examples of havdala. 1) the Tzimtzum between Middos and Dibbur, 2) the tzimtzum between Sechel and Middos.

Page 31-2. This Ma’amar which further explains the idea of the light coming from a higher level to a lower level through a series of havdalos (separations) where each consists of two steps: 1) removal of the Pnimiyus, 2) the Chitzoniyus lowers itself. Here we discuss certain ideas that introduce this to a variety of…

Page 29-30 (and before). The two opposites of the Kav: 1) how far from the Ein Sof it is. It went through Tzimtzum and has been changed from Iggul to Kav, and is only a Haara DiHaaara of the Ein Sof; on the other hand the Tzimtzum imposes nothing on the Kav other than to…

Page 27-9. Malchus is a Midda which is so separate from the Nefesh that it is altogether outside the (ohr of) the Nefesh. Kochos (Sechel, Middos and Chushim) are outside the Nefesh but it is still close enough to the Nefesh to be considered a Nafshi. Malchus has a low end which is altogether outside…

Page 25-6. This Ma’amar follows the two that came before it and it is notes on the new Ma’amar based on the earlier Shiurim. This class reviews the previous ones, has much discussion and Q&A and explains a few ideas inside. 1) Ata Hu Hashem livadecha, 2) Ad Shelo Nivra HaOlom Haya Hu Ushmu Bilvad….

Page 23 (-25). This Shiur explores levels in Ohr Ein Sof and explains (in order and from the top down) the various ‘Havdalos’ (Tzimtzumim) that happen even before the first Tzimtzum (separates the Iggul from the Kav). 1) Etzem of Ein Sof which is not even Giluy, 2) Giluy to Himself, this has Sfiros within…

Page 23. Ohr has the opposite characteristics of Shefa: 1) It comes from the Source automatically, passively, and has nothing of the Source itself; 2) It has everything that the source has, however there are two additional characteristics: 3) It is with Will, this means that if Hashem didn’t want Ohr it wouldn’t be. Nevertheless…

Page 20 ff. In explaining havdala (which is about Ohr Ein Sof) he prefaces the discussion of Ohr and Shefa. Ohr is everything but nothing of the Etzem, Shefa is limited but the Giver is Giving (of Himself,) as He is involved. the second half of this class is discussing two details in the maamar…